PLEASE NOTE: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.
Representations on Deposit Joint Local Development Plan - 7.2.38
OBJECT Angela Williams
Summary:
The Gillespie Report is flawed by reliance on mathematical exactitude, rather than regarding the consideration of amenity as being people-based. Responses to the SPG of 2012/13 not considered.
Changes: i) Take consideration of the provisions of the SPG ii) separation distances in the Gillespie Report must be disregarded due to limitations of their research.
OBJECT Mrs Irene Stott
Summary:
The seperation distance is arbitary and no better than the agreed distances
in the existing SPGs which were supposed to be transferred to the LDP and should be used.
Use the seperation distances as agreed in the Anglesey SPG
OBJECT Rod Dixon
Summary:
The seperation distance is arbitary and no better than the agreed distances in the existing SPGs which were supposed to be transferred to the LDP.
Use the seperation distances as agreed in the Anglesey SPG
Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.Powered by 